Monday, March 26, 2012

No really. How come you guys call us racist? (this is getting a bit tiresome)

I'll give you a little hint: it's because so many of you are!

Well, apparently my vacation is over. My week away no more. I came home to this story sitting in my Google Reader.

The station manager of Gospel Station 93.9 in Ada, Oklahoma, a Christian radio station, Teddy Oyler, commented on a friend's Facebook status that "Obama isn't that smart he is a dumb ni**er"

How...errr.... Christian of him.

image via addictinginfo.org


After the proverbial shit hit the fan, Oyler posted an apology on his own Facebook page. I call it a pretty half-assed apology, and if it was any more begrudging, he could have just called the President a ni**er again.

image via addictinginfo.org
Gee. I'm so underwhelmed by your apology. Although my outrage isn't the issue here. Wonder how the President feels about it?

Read the full story at Addicting Info here.

Quote of the day

Quote of the day:

"Why isn’t the president or Congress on Obamacare if it’s so good?" ~ A random protester outside the Supreme Court, where hearings began today over the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act

Uhhh... I really hate to break it to you, buddy, but Congress and the President have been on government-regulated healthcare much longer than the rest of us. Duuude, the government is their employer.

And now for something completely different... a book review: Jimmy Carter's 'Our Endangered Values: America's Moral Crisis'

Hey - something different - a book review! It's inspired by this post from 2 1/2 years ago, actually, in Politics Daily, written to highlight Jimmy Carter's op-ed piece in The Age called Losing My Religion for Equality, where Carter talks about how the lack of equality for women, and the desire to subjugate them, has caused an insurmountable rift between him and the Southern Baptist Church. I hadn't read this before, and was frankly, surprised that he felt strongly enough to leave his church.

Carter is a very religious man, and he goes about his practice of Christianity in the way I like to think G-d intended. He doesn't feel the need to wear it on his sleeve. He goes about his business quietly, doing the good deeds that he believes he should be doing (and how!). Without a call to be recognized. Without whoremongering for the media. Without shouting, "Hey, look at me!! I'm the most religious man on the planet - aren't I the most awesomest EVAR!!!" He truly walks the walk, and I have nothing but the utmost respect for him as a human being, and as a man.

Carter, in my opinion, is a true example to the religious right and all the GOP religious zealots on how to incorporate your deep religious beliefs into your daily practice, and yet still be true to the Constitution you swore to uphold and defend. I only hope that some of them will sit up and take notice, and perhaps read this book.

Thanks to the "We Are Women" Facebook page for the original link. And if you don't know about the march against the War on Women, I highly suggest that you find out about it. There will be marches on all the state capitals on April 28, and a national march in DC in September.



Anyway... back to my original topic... Carter and this fabulous book. Go read it. Now.

This review was originally posted on my book review blog, and I thought it totally appropriate to post here as well.

I first read this book in 2005, and it is as relevant today as it was then. I'm reposting my review of it here, because my opinion hasn't changed one iota since I originally read this book, and it's too good not to mention it again and in this forum. If you haven't read any of Carter's books, you really should.

Jimmy Carter has to be one of the most amazing, underappreciated, underrated men our country has been privileged to have as a public servant. Yes, his presidency was plagued with the energy/gas crisis, the Iran Hostage crisis, etc, but in the years since his presidency, he has earned himself an even bigger, brighter place in not just American history, but world history.

This book focuses on history and, to a large extent, on the Bush (the 2nd) administration's subservience to the fundamentalist conservative right. Although parts of the book are a scathing criticism of the Bush administration, he backs up his positions with biblical scripture and historical events and perspectives. He is, by his own admission, a devout evangelical "born again" Christian. Yet he passionately defends the separation of church and state and defended the Supreme Court decision of Roe v. Wade, although it went against his own personal beliefs.

He devotes chapters in this book to civil rights, homosexuality, the death penalty, abortion, science and religion, divorce, women's rights, and environmental issues including drilling for oil in Alaska, preserving America's national parks and global warming, and the US policies on decreasing emissions in relation to the rest of the industrialized world. There are chapters on our global image, the growing gap between rich and poor both in the US and globally, North Korea, Cuba, nuclear proliferation/disarmament, (in)humane treatment of POWs, government-sanctioned torture, and war (globally and specifically in Iraq).

This is not a "democrat" vs "republican" issue, he is quick to point out, and the book backs up this assertion. Instead, he concentrates on the increasingly strong influence of religion into politics, which, he contends, should be separate. He puts every chapter into perspective relative to his own strong religious convictions and beliefs. He contends that religion has its place in politics in the same way that it has its place in everyday life - by guiding our hand toward being valuable, moral and compassionate human beings - not by guiding public policy and law.

As a Jew, I found this a fascinating read, given his self-admitted evangelical bent. Although we have different religious beliefs, it is clear to me that he respects every human being's right to believe passionately in their own religion, but not at the expense of others. As an American, I found it equally as fascinating, although a bit demoralizing to read about some of the positions taken by our country's leadership (and by default, the country's citizenry), and as a human being, I am equally captivated and appalled by the lack of far-sightedness he portrays by the Bush administration and the past leadership of our country, and its lasting ramifications.

A fascinating read, and I recommend it highly, along with any of his other twenty-odd books, including his poetry. At the top of my TBR pile is 2010's White House Diary. I'm sure it will be as engrossing and thought-provoking as everything else he's written.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Liar doctors and whorish women

I'm starting off with an apology to my mom, who thinks I swear too much on this blog. Mom, you might want to stop reading right about... now. Because, cussing ahoy!

Because I feel a need to talk about the fucktard asswipe pieces of shit that made the news today.

All across this country, male legislators are proving their asshattery in legislative efforts and then trying to 'take it back" when everyone around them calls them on their craptastic assholish fuckwadery.

Let's see, where to start today's news... I know! How about with Idaho's Senator Chuck Winder, who is counting on women to be honest if their rape was "truly" a rape.

From The Spokesman: (emphasis mine)

In his closing debate in favor of SB 1387, Sen. Chuck Winder, R-Boise, said, “This bill does not require a trans-vaginal exam. … It leaves that up to the patient and the physician to make that determination.” He said, “Rape and incest was used as a reason to oppose this. I would hope that when a woman goes in to a physician with a rape issue, that physician will indeed ask her about perhaps her marriage, was this pregnancy caused by normal relations in a marriage or was it truly caused by a rape. I assume that's part of the counseling that goes on.”

Winder said, “I believe the state does have an interest in the life of the unborn. That's what the debate's about. Does it add cost? Yes, it does. I would just ask you to consider the pricelessness of the unborn.” He noted the Senate's recent commemoration of military members killed in Iraq and Afghanistan in the past year. “Each person has a life story,” Winder said. “Those were cut short. Let's not choose to cut others short.”

There is so much going on here I almost don't know where to start. OK, yes, maybe I do. A rape issue? Please, I don't think that women who have been raped think they are simply bringing an issue to the attention of their doctor. It's a fucking trauma. An abuse. An act of freaking violence perpetrated against a victim. Not an accuser.

Next. Was the pregnancy truly caused by a rape? Really? Because a woman can't be trusted to tell the truth about it? Fuck you.

And also, comparing a woman's right to autonomy over her body to soldiers dying in war ? What an insult to our fighting men and women. Those who put their lives on the line every day fighting for Senator Winder's right to be an asshole in the comfort of his own home.

And then, once pushback over Winder's horrendous remarks came pouring out, he backtracked (the pussy). Via the AP:

Winder said he was pointing out that a woman would likely want to consult with her physician and perform tests to determine if the child she was carrying was a product of a rape, so as not to allow doctors to abort a consensual conception.

“I used a married woman, the idea being that as a woman or a couple, whether they be married or unmarried at the time, would want to find out if the pregnancy occurred as the product of the rape, or whether the pregnancy was unknown at the time,” Winder told The Associated Press. “There was never any intention on my part to question the honesty of a woman in cases of rape.”

You'll pardon me, Senator Winder, if when you bring up this issue, that I might wonder if this was caused by normal synapses in your brain, or if it was truly an act of idiotic ignorance and insensitivity on your part.

What else happened today? Oh, yes. How could I forget? State Rep Alan Dick, an aptly named fellow, has decided that women should have to produce written agreement from the father before an abortion can be performed. And if she doesn't know who the father is, she has to supply a written list of all her sexual partners (the hooorish slut). I see.

Perhaps she should go visit her rapist to ask if it's ok with him? Or her abusive husband? Come to think of it, why should she have to ask anybody's freaking permission to have a god-damned LEGAL procedure performed on HER OWN body?

And gee, if she's such a slut that she doesn't know who the father is, then we'll just call all her poor unsuspecting boyfriends and make sure they all know what a whore she is.

Via The Mudflats:

[State Rep. Alan Dick] said that he doesn’t believe that when a woman is pregnant, it’s really “her pregnancy.” As a matter of fact, he would advocate for criminalizing women who have an abortion without the permission via written signature from the man who impregnated her. He stated, “If I thought that the man’s signature was required… required, in order for a woman to have an abortion, I’d have a little more peace about it…” He didn’t say whether a rapist would be able to send his signature by fax from prison, or not. But he’ll have “peace” and women will require a permission slip for their own bodies.

I'm so glad he can have some peace. Phew! That was worrying me. Mr. Alan Dick? Meet Rush Limbaugh Dickhead. You can commiserate about all those whores and sluts out there feeding off the welfare state to cut those precious zygotes out of their bodies before they have a chance to become the next Dick.

And as for it not being "her pregnancy"? Mr Dick, when you have to push the equivalent of a watermelon out of a hole the size of your urethra, then we'll talk about whose pregnancy it really is.

And while we're at it, how about requiring men to get a woman to sign his permission slip for his vasectomy? Because he'd be depriving her unknowing self of all those potential zygotes.

Guess what? Do I sound like an angry feminist? I never was. Guess who brought me to this point? Yes, Mr. Dick, that would be you. I've always been a live and let live person. You make that so difficult. Truly.

Last, let's not forget to talk about the Georgia peach who calls physicians liars simply for telling the truth about the scientific research. So sorry that you don't believe in science, and that science has apparently been outlawed in Georgia, along with those folks with brown skin and weird sounding names, and well, being female.

Rep. Doug McKillip is accusing medical witnesses liars for presenting scientific facts to a legislative hearing.

Via The Atlanta Journal Constitution: (emphasis mine)

Under House Bill 954, almost all abortions later than 20 weeks, including those involving rape and incest, would be banned under the premise that after 20 weeks a fetus is capable of feeling pain. Dott and two other obstetricians, also specialists in high-risk pregnancies, told the panel that overwhelming medical evidence has established that a fetus does not develop the capacity to feel pain until the 28th week of gestation. When doctors operate on fetuses younger than 28 weeks, the committee was told, it is standard medical practice not to use anesthetic because the neural connections needed to feel pain simply do not exist.

Yet the sponsor of the bill, state Rep. Doug McKillip, summarily dismissed the threshold of 28 weeks. “Does anybody believe that? Absolutely not,” he told the panel, in effect calling the medical experts liars. “They are just looking for a reason to say no to this bill.”

In asking for an exception that would at least allow “medically futile” pregnancies to be ended, [Dr. Andrew] Dott told the panel that he delivered his first baby in an elevator in medical school 45 years ago. In all his years of practice, he told the panel, “I have never seen a patient who electively aborted a normal pregnancy greater than 20 weeks.”

McKillip blithely dismissed that claim as well. In fact, he repeatedly treated medical experts testifying against his bill with a zealot’s scorn verging on downright contempt. Contradicting Dott, he insisted that “grand majority” of abortions performed in Georgia past the 20th week are abortions of convenience. But again, he cited nothing more than his own considerable moral certitude as evidence.


It really irks my shit that none of these male people (whom I refuse to call men, because they exhibit none of the characteristics of a true man) think anything about a woman's suffering or pain. That they all think they are so pious and righteous when all they are are pricks who want to show how much more powerful they are than the rest of us. And really? An abortion of convenience? Is that anything like a marriage of convenience? Just curious.

So... sorry about this, Mom. Guess I went a little overboard on the cussing when talking about how these legislators are practically sanctioning rape, calling physicians liars to their face (because their own medical degree from I Know Everything About Women's Bodies Medical School is far more valid and respected than an actual, you know, medical degree). But, well? Mr. Dick? How could I not. He was practically asking for it.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

No really, how come you guys always call us racist? Eleventy!!!1!!

Racist Anti-Obama Sticker Makes Rounds On Facebook

One of the highlights here is a bumper sticker that reads "Don't Re-Nig In 2012." The text below reads: "Stop repeat offenders. Don't re-elect Obama!"

The racist website that is hosting this abomination (and many others, if you watch the slideshow in the linked article) is Stumpy's Stickers. I refuse to link to it.

The fact that this is accepted behavior in our country is so distasteful. Worse than distasteful. Disgraceful. Disgusting. All the other Dis- words you can think of. If this were happening in reverse, you can bet there would be an outcry. You can bet someone would be going down. Imagine somebody saying all these things about Allen West. Believe me, there is plenty I could say about West's politics. Cause he's got idiotic ideas about what to do for our country. Are these ideas because he's black? No, they're because he's got freaking stupid ideas.

When someone is killed, and they will be, I hope all these people are brought to justice as co-conspirators.

Just because you don't agree with someone's politics, you don't get to attack them personally like this. Attack him on the issues - fine. But this is so far beyond human decency, I have nothing but contempt for anyone who doesn't denounce it.

You people are the reason that we are a laughingstock around the world, and why other countries look upon us with contempt.

Way to class it up, racists.

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

The right to teach my children what I want them to learn... and only what I want them to learn

This has been a battle cry of the far right for several years, most notably when discussing sex education and contraception education in schools. It has now moved on to how we teach history and ethnic studies and science.

First of all, I have to say that I am tremendously distressed by the movement to limit our children's access to knowledge. It's borne out of fear, plain and simple. Fear that our children might believe something different than ourselves. And borne out of a fear that educating the masses will cause them to think for themselves. And thus, think differently than us. And by "us", I refer to those in power, or a parent's fear of a child not reinforcing their own beliefs, thus validating themselves in the process. In the conservative world, this means that they might become liberal, atheist, or embrace some other "left-wing" ideology.

I look at things a little differently.

First off, YES. It is MY responsibility to teach my children to become moral, valuable people who treat others with respect and keep an open mind when it comes to learning new things. I do this in several ways. I give my children a religious education. They learn about their history and the history of their people at Sunday school. They learn the language of their people at Hebrew school. They learn the values of our religion by going to services and becoming part of the religious community.

Do I think thast everyone should have to belong to my temple? No. Do I believe that everyone should respect my right to belong to my temple? Yes.

I also teach my children the concepts of moral, valuable behavior by simply talking to them. We talk about all sorts of things - from current political issues to old historical issues, to science and everything in between.

I also teach my children to be moral, valuable people by my own actions. Do I always make the right decisions? No. Do I always try to make the right decisions? Yes. Do my children know this? Yes. 

It is MY responsibility to sit down with my children at the dinner table and ask what they learned in school that day. And to then supplement their science class with discussion, so that I'm certain they understand the issues, where I stand on the issues and why, and why learning about these issues is important. To talk about their history lesson and the implications it has on the world today and on the future of our community, our country, and the world. To talk about why reading that book they hate can be so important as they go through life.

It is NOT the responsibility of my child's school to be the sole source of information for my kids. I don't know of anyone who believes that our education system should work that way. Anyone who believes that the only education our children get is from school is either deluding themselves or is plain stupid.

Kids learn from the world around them. They learn from their parents. Not just what we say, but what we do and how we act and treat others. They learn from their friends. They learn from the world around them. And it's our job as parents to vet the information they get from their friends and the external world and filter it through our own values and morals. This teaches our children to look at the world through a wider lens than just what their parents think. It teaches them to analyze information and discuss outcomes and repercussions of decision-making. It teaches them to be independent thinkers. And while some may be afraid of what that implies (loss of control over other human beings and their thoughts), I view it as a job well done. I WANT my kids to be independent thinkers. To be innovative. To be tolerant. To be thoughtful, not just in the way they treat others, but in the true definition of the word - to THINK about the world around them and act in a way that implies they have THOUGHT about their actions and all that entails.

My kids want to go away to college. I view this as a parental victory. Not because I don't want them with me. Heck, they both promised to marry me, right? Even if it was 15 years ago, I will always be their first love. Take THAT, potential daughters-in-law...  But I digress. I view their desire to go away to college as a victory because I am raising independent, confident children. Young adults who are confident in their ability to navigate the world around them. Who have a thirst for knowledge and the desire to go seek it out. This signals a parental victory in my view. Will I miss them. Oh, and how. Will they come home and visit me? They'd better. Will they still love me? Of course. Will they carry the lessons they've learned in our home wherever they go? Absolutely.

It is NOT my job as a parent to ensure my child learns nothing of the world. Keeping my children from learning about other cultures, about not just the good things our country has done, but the not-so-good and the lessons that can be learned from those outcomes, and from learning about how to protect themselves out in the world is destructive to their growth as human beings. And by that, I don't mean teaching them to use that AK-47 in the front room to protect against the FedEx guy when he comes knocking. I mean ensuring they have the knowledge of how to protect themselves when they go off to college and have that first real relationship. And yes, I'm actually talking about knowing they know how to use a condom. And knowing they know how to treat a woman properly, and that no means no. Ensuring they know that they don't live in a vacuum. That their actions impact others around them as well as the world and environment around them.  Ensuring they know how to speak up for themselves if they believe they are being treated unfairly and to know what options they have if being discriminated against. Ensuring that no matter what job they have, they are prepared for that environment.

I live in what I like to refer to as the "Bible belt" of my county. People in my city tend toward the very conservative and fundamentalist. My kids have already each encountered antisemitism. They've encountered bullying. It's my job as a parent to ensure that they know the appropriate way to manage those situations, and to back them up if necessary. But I also believe it's the job of my public school system to have my back. To supplement that home-teaching with the lesson that listening to others is important. That we don't all think, believe, and act the same. That there are basic tenets of decency that we all should live by. We don't need to call it the Ten Commandments. We don't need to teach it as Bible. The ideas taught in the bible boil down to The Golden Rule. Treat others as you would wish them to treat you.

If we teach our kids this one concept, at home and at school, there would be far less intolerance. There would be far less violence. There would be far less acrimony. There would be studied discussion and debate around what is good for our country. There would be no cheering for 234 people put to death in one state. There would be no cheering at the thought of letting a fellow human being die because they lacked health insurance. There would be no suppression of human rights and no birth control debate.

But it is also my job, and the most important one I will ever undertake, to ensure that my kids are prepared to go out into the world as independent adults, make decisions for themselves, be able to provide for themselves, and to be good people. Am I saying that they should accept blindly what they are taught in school? No, of course not. In fact, just the opposite. I am saying that what our children learn in school should lead to discussions. Discussions with their friends. Discussions around the dinner table. Discussions of the pros and cons of what they learned. Of how we can take what they learned and do it better next time. Or learn not to do it again. So our children can see where we stand on the issues. If we've done our job right, they will always side with treating people respectfully. If we haven't done our jobs right, our children will be ignorant. Afraid. Unable to think and reason for themselves. Unable to participate in global dialogue. Or even local or national dialogue.

Do I expect the support of my public school in this endeavor? Yes. Do I expect my public school to teach my kids morals? No. But do I expect my school to provide an environment which supports what I teach them at home about fairness, equality, and character? Yes.

If I don't care for the way the public schools operate, I have options. If I want my children to receive a religious education rather than a secular one, I have options. I can home-school my kids. I can send them to private school (either parochial or secular). I have many friends who have done this. Do I think less of them? No. Do I expect the public schools to teach religion? No, not in the sense of religion as a spiritual journey. But learning about other cultures often involves learning about other religions. This breeds tolerance. We are afraid of the unknown. As a people, this is natural and normal. In order to not be afraid, we shouldn't strive to suppress anything that is not like us, but embrace learning about those who are different than us. Knowledge is power. Knowledge suppresses fear.

Rewriting history to deny that we ever kept slaves or that slavery was good because it drove our economy does not do our children any favors. In fact, it's detrimental. To have no sense of the consequences of history dooms us to repeat it. "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." ~ George Santayana (1905) Reason in Common Sense, volume 1 of The Life of Reason. While as a Jew, I've heard this most often in context with the Holocaust, it applies to so many other things in American (and world) history.

But since I'm focused on what's happening in America... if we don't remember what happened when we enslaved an entire people for our own profit and sense of self-worth, we are bound to repeat it. If we don't remember what happened when we treated the Native Americans as savages simply because they lived differently than us and we had an inflated opinion of our own society and culture, we are bound to repeat it. If we don't remember how we mistreated children by forcing them to work long hours in dangerous conditions, we are bound to repeat it. If we don't remember the consequences of armed citizens in the streets running around willy-nilly shooting others over simple disagreements, we are bound to repeat it. If we don't remember the consequences of not paying people a living wage, we are bound to repeat it. If we don't remember the consequences of unsafe working conditions, we are bound to repeat it. If we don't remember the consequences of back alley abortions, we are bound to repeat it. If we don't remember the consequences of religious oppression, we are bound to repeat it.

If we don't remember the golden rule, we are bound to lose our humanity.

Fear breeds intolerance. Fear breeds anger. Fear breeds violence.

Why would you want your children to be afraid, intolerant, angry, and violent?

We have a presidental candidate touring the country telling people that to go to college means you are a snob. (Of course, at the same time telling us that his charitable contributions were less than the other candidates because he had 3 children to send to college.) The desire to learn and expand our world-view is not one of snobbery. The desire to suppress the seeking of knowledge is one of pure fear. You cannot control those around you if they are knowledgable. You cannot control those around you if they have access to additional information and know what to do with it. You cannot control those around you if they have access to people different than themselves, people who think, look, and act differently than themselves. Additionally, telling people not to strive to better themselves through knowledge goes against everything our founding fathers stood for. Everything our country has ever stood for. Hell, it goes against everything humanity has ever stood for. As long as there have been people, there has been the desire to learn. To expand. To improve. To grow. Through knowledge.

Knowledge breeds power. Knowledge breeds tolerance. Knowledge breeds debate, and discussion, and yes, disagreement. But knowledge also grants us the tools to treat those we disagree with, with dignity. With respect. It teaches us the value of compromise. Of the greater good. Of how the real world works.

The mantra of the far right over the last few years has been that we are going to be the first generation whose children are less successful than ourselves.

Our children will never be able to be successful in the global world if they are cloaked in ignorance. If they refuse to accept things that the rest of the world believes, or even to acknowledge that others have the right to believe what they want and think for themselves. If they refuse to accept other people as they are, rather than attempt to force them to fit into their own mold and world-view.

And THAT, my friends, is what will make the next generation less successful than ours.

Not the economy.
Not the price of gas.
Not the changing climate.

What will make our children less successful than us, is sending them out into the world unprepared and ignorant in interpersonal relationships. Ignorant in how to conduct themselves in a multicultural world. Ignorant in how to conduct themselves in business. Ignorant in how to learn. And grow. And prosper.

That is not the world I want for my children. Is it the world you want for yours?

Friday, March 9, 2012

This is so the stupidest thing you're going to read today

I had planned to write a post about HR 347 (the "Trespass Bill") and how Congress is basically legislating the repeal of the 1st amendment, and how President Obama will likely sign it, and I still plan to do that, but this headline caught my eye today, and I thought perhaps it would be incumbent upon me to note once again how incredibly idiotic Sarah Palin is, and how I would love for her to have to take a US History exam (forget World History - learn your own country's history, for crying out loud!).

This is so the stupidest thing you're going to read all day.

Palin Says Obama Wants To Return To Racial Discrimination 'That Took Place Before The Civil War'

Talk about an oxymoron. Emphasis on moron.




Really? REALLY? Our President, who is black, wants pre-Civil War conditions? Really? This is so effing preposterous that I can't actually address it directly. Other than to state the obvious, which is that you are one crazysauce mothereffing pile of shit-stinking stupidity. But that's an insult to stupidity. So I won't say that.

What I will do is to point out that the laws being passed that are pushing us back to pre-Civil War times? Yeah. All done by Republicans.

Turning the country back into a lawless wild west where anyone can carry a gun anywhere, and pretty much use it any time? Yup. Republicans.

Pushing back women's rights so that our doctors have the right to lie to us just so we'll birth some more babies? Yup. Republican.

Wanting to make birth control illegal? Yup. Republicans.

Re-enacting Jim Crow laws, deliberately suppressing the rights of minority voters? Yup. Republicans.

Cut immigration so that those dirty Mexicans (née Irish) can't get in to our amazingly wonderful country that should only allow those of us in who came and massacred the people already living here in the name of God back in the day? Yeah. Republicans.

So Sarah, remind me again who it is that wants us to be back in the 1850s?

Oh, and by the way? That class warfare from pre-Civil War of which you speak? Dude. It's called SLAVERY.

Somehow I doubt that's really what President Obama is after. But you, on the other hand? Yeah. Not so sure.


Of course, my favorite Palin history gaffe: Paul Revere warns the British they can't take our guns away!
"He who warned, uh, the British that they weren't gonna be takin' away our arms, uh, by ringing those bells, and um, makin' sure as he's riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be sure and we were going to be free, and we were going to be armed." ~Sarah Palin, June 3, 2011

For your amusement (because lord knows, we need some amusement these days), here are a bunch more...

And because it also amuses me, I love how Michele Bachmann and John Wayne (Gacy) are from the same town!! High Five!

These are the women who make men think that women are stupid and can't make decisions for themselves. 


Just sayin.